There is an anonymous email currently doing the rounds, which claims to be
a "A profound explanation on Tax in Australia". It appears to be copied from a pre-existing anonymous email about the American
tax system. Note that on his web page Dr. David R. Kamerschen
**denies** that he is the author of the email! In my opinion, the original is biased due to selective editing.
Here is my response (written by me on 20th May 2004). Yes, it's simplistic, weak-brained and biased, just like the original. The numbers are based on typical differences between charge out rates and salary rates.

Camera pulls back from the diners consuming dinner at the dinner table and rewinds to the kitchen. It just so happens the ten diners worked in the kitchen, producing the dinner they had just eaten.

The tenth diner, the owner of the restaurant, is sitting on his backside telling the head cook to make the cooks work faster. Each time a customer pays their $100 bill, the owner takes $67 and gives the remaining $33 to the cooks.

One day the owner gets peeved off at something and disappears, never to be seen again. The nine cooks, look at each other, shrug, then carry on cooking as before. When the next customer pays their $100 bill, they wonder what to do with the $67 which the owner used to take. They decide to split it equally.

It turns out that with this $67 the nine diners could afford to buy dinner after all.

That, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how fat cats leach off those around them without contributing anything useful to society.

Copyright 2004 by John Dalton and distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License.

The GNU General Public License is the complete license, but by way of explanation I highlight the following:

- As set out by the GNU GPL, you may distribute copies and modify the text, but if you do so all modifications must also be licensed under the GNU General Public License.
- You may not falsely claim copyright or remove my copyright notice.
- If you do not adhere to the GNU GPL, you are deemed not to have accepted the terms of the license and I reserve all rights and specifically the right to name my own terms.

Author Unknown

Subject: FW: A profound explanation on Tax in AustraliaA good read when you got 5 min to spare...

Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.

Suppose that every day, ten people go out for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this -

- The first four (the poorest) would pay nothing.
- The fifth would pay $1.
- The sixth would pay $3.
- The seventh $7.
- The eighth $12.
- The ninth $18.
- The tenth (the richest) would pay $59.
So, that's what the 10 people decided to do.

They ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a problem. "Since you are all such good customers," the owner said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20."

So, now dinner for the ten only cost $80. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So, the first four were unaffected, they would still eat for free.

What about the other six, the paying customers? How could they divvy up the $20 windfall so that everyone would get their 'fair share'?

The six paying customers realised that $20 divided by six is $3.33. If they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth and the sixth would each end up being 'PAID' to eat their meal.

So, the restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each person's bill by roughly the same amount, and proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so -

- The fifth, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
- The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).
- The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).
- The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
- The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
- The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).
Each of the six was better off than before. The first four continued to eat for free. Once outside the restaurant, they began to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth, pointing to the tenth diner "but they got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that they got ten times more than me!"

"That's true!!" shouted the seventh. "Why should they get $10 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine surrounded and beat up the tenth diner.

The next night the tenth diner didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without number ten. When it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

That, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table any more.